On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > Am 17.03.2011 09:57, schrieb Eric Smith: >> On 3/16/2011 11:58 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: >>> I agree that half the changesets are merges now. >> >> Which has basically stopped me from reviewing changes. I can't quickly >> tell the real changes from the noise of merges. > > Even though every merge changeset mail has "merge" in its subject? I just set up a mail rule to further split up python-checkins email so that they all get tagged with "python-checkins-all", while only those that aren't merges get tagged with "python-checkins". That should make the latter far less noisy than it has been. > Also, we don't really have more revisions than before: for every merge > now we typically had a svnmerge then. (Or not, in which case a bugfix > wasn't applied to a branch just because it would have been a bother.) I think it has been exacerbated by the flurry of activity from the sprints. It should be less noticeable once things settle down. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4