On 3/17/2011 6:28 AM, Georg Brandl wrote: > Am 17.03.2011 09:57, schrieb Eric Smith: >> On 3/16/2011 11:58 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: >>> I agree that half the changesets are merges now. >> >> Which has basically stopped me from reviewing changes. I can't quickly >> tell the real changes from the noise of merges. > > Even though every merge changeset mail has "merge" in its subject? > > Also, we don't really have more revisions than before: for every merge > now we typically had a svnmerge then. (Or not, in which case a bugfix > wasn't applied to a branch just because it would have been a bother.) Maybe it's just the overall volume of the commits during the sprints. Plus, I've always thought it would be a good way to sneak malicious code in by labeling it as an svnmerge or now hg merge, so I've tried to review everything. I find myself slipping behind, and I'm not happy with it. I'm just being cranky, and hg is a convenient target. Just ignore me.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4