On 3/16/2011 5:54 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Raymond Hettinger > <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: > .. >> The version number in the decimal module refers to the version of the >> spec that is being complied with. I would like that version number >> to remain in the module. > > I mentioned this in my first post. If the version number of the spec > is important, shouldn't it be called something else? I agree, especially if we need to issue a new version of the library that implements the same spec. We couldn't upgrade __version__, since it's used for the spec. There'd be no way to know (by inspection) if the version of the library fixed a spec compliance issue. Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4