On 3/16/2011 12:10 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: > Hi all, > > As I'm sure you're all aware, the PyCon sprints are going on right now > and will run for two more days. As a result, you may have noticed an Yes. Emphasizing improved test coverage was a great idea. It is relatively easy and definitely needed, as shown by regressions due to lack thereof. So there is no argument about whether a good patch should go in. > increased number of patches over the last few days -- many of these were > from first-time contributors. The turnout for the CPython sprint has > been huge and I wanted to introduce and thank a number of people for > coming out. > > Scott Wilson > Denver Coneybeare > Jeff Ramnani > Alicia Arlen > Michael Henry > Natalia Bidart > Matias Bordese > Robbie Clemons > Evan Dandrea > Jonathan Hartley > Piotr Kaspyrzyk > Brandon Craig Rhodes Please let them know if they do not read pydev that we are not a closed club and that push rights are a reasonable aspiration within a year after 20 patch submissions or so (and not necessary all accepted). -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4