On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml at behnel.de> wrote: > I still consider this is mostly a communication issue. If this change had > been properly written up, preferably in a PEP, including the reasoning for > it to get done, I think this whole discussion would not have been necessary. Yes, I think we need to keep "topic of wider interest" in mind when deciding whether or not to write up a PEP, even if the change isn't particularly controversial amongst the core developers. We made a similar mistake with the zipfile and directory execution changes. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4