On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:00:42 +0100 > Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote: >> >> The standard approach in mercurial is for her to pull the changes and to >> do a merge before trying to push again (and hope nobody else "raced" her >> again, this time). > > This is indeed the standard approach, so I'm not sure what the point of > mentioning it in the devguide would be. I don't think the devguide > should turn into a Mercurial tutorial: there are plenty of them on the > Web. Given our stated preference for pushing collapsed changesets, it does seem worthwhile to explicitly mention the pull/merge/push case as a case where a collapsed changeset isn't expected. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4