A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109331.html below:

[Python-Dev] Finally switch urllib.parse to RFC3986 semantics?

[Python-Dev] Finally switch urllib.parse to RFC3986 semantics? [Python-Dev] Finally switch urllib.parse to RFC3986 semantics?Senthil Kumaran orsenthil at gmail.com
Wed Mar 16 00:14:29 CET 2011
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> With RFC 3986 passing its 6th birthday, and with it being well past
> its 7th by the time 3.3 comes out, can we finally switch to supporting
> the current semantics rather than the obsolete behaviour?

We do infact, support RFC 3986, expect for the cases where those
conflict with the previous RFCs. (IOW, backwards compatible).
The tests can give you a good picture here. Do you mean, we should
just do away with backwards  compatibility? Or you had anything else
specifically in mind?

-- 
Senthil
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4