2011/3/15 Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu>: > On 3/15/2011 1:00 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> >> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 04:19:24 +0100 >> ezio.melotti<python-checkins at python.org> wrote: >>> >>> Modules/_ctypes/libffi/src/powerpc/ffi_darwin.c >>> Modules/_ctypes/libffi_osx/powerpc/ppc-ffi_darwin.c >> >> libffi is a third-party library and you should probably not introduce >> gratuitous changes in these files. It will make tracking changes with >> upstream more tedious. > > This answers my question elsewhere of why revert real fixes. Perhaps the > fixes could be submitted upstream. It really doesn't matter if there's typos in 3rd party libraries which we distribute. > > Is that status and the restriction on changes indicated in the file? No, because that would make updating it annoying, too. :) -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4