Would you please post this to bugs.python.org so that it doesn't get lost? thanks! -gps On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Bill Green <bill at supposedly.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I ran across this issue several months ago and filed a bug report (#9667). > It just came up again, and it doesn't look like anything's been done with > the bug report, so I thought I'd post here. > > In _cursesmodule.c there are a lot of preprocesser conditionals that test > if the system is NetBSD. In my case, the issue was that the module built > lacked the KEY_UP / _DOWN / etc. constants, but there are other changes as > well. This is the case even if you're compiling against ncurses instead of > the system curses. Αttached below is a patch against 2.7.1 that negates the > NetBSD conditionals if ncurses is present. It seems to work as expected, > although I haven't done any real testing. I assumed this was done because > NetBSD curses was missing something, but I looked at the headers and it > seems to have most of the constants that the compilation directives are > leaving out (A_INVIS, the aforementioned KEY_* constants, at least), so I'm > not sure why that code isn't compiled in anyway. Please let me know if I'm > misunderstanding this. > > Thanks, > Bill > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/greg%40krypto.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110315/6f1faa93/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4