On 3/14/2011 8:44 PM, James Mills wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:48 AM, R. David Murray<rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote: >> But directly calling a __xxx__ method in Python is a very >> unusual thing to do. It would be extremely odd to have that >> be the expected way to call a method on a class. > > Can't namedtuple be improved to support the named fields _and_ > have as_dict() and replace() without leading underscores ? How would that work if you had a field named "replace"? I think Raymond's current design is as good as it's going to get. Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4