On 07/03/2011 21:33, Glenn Linderman wrote: > On 3/7/2011 4:00 PM, Michael Foord wrote: >> On 07/03/2011 23:52, Greg Ewing wrote: >>> Michael Foord wrote: >>> >>>> - I doubt calling it python.exe will fly, but I'm not sure. If >>>> so what will you call what is currently 'python.exe'? - if not then >>>> "python foo.py" on the command line will *still* not work... >>> >>> However, if it's installed as the exe associated with the .py >>> and .pyw extensions, then simply 'foo.py' on the command line >>> *will* work, and will work better than it does now. >>> >> So long as '.py' and '.pyw' are set in the PATHEXT environment >> variable. (Which again the Python installer doesn't do by default.) > > > No, PATHEXT only means you can invoke > > foo.py > > and > > foo > > and get the same results (sometimes, depending on what all in on PATH > and PATHEXT) You're correct of course. My apologies. Michael Foord > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110314/7fd2a870/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4