A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109206.html below:

[Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)

[Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer) [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)skip at pobox.com skip at pobox.com
Sun Mar 13 04:54:03 CET 2011
>>>>> "Martin" == Martin v Löwis <martin at v.loewis.de> writes:

    Martin> Am 12.03.11 22:36, schrieb skip at pobox.com:
    Martin> I don't think any of the regular core committers got any such
    Martin> explicit veto powers on any code...
    >> 
    >> "Veto powers" is your term, not mine.  I suggested that Raymond's opinion
    >> should be accorded extra weight.  This isn't the UN Security Council.

    Martin> Yes, but you were comparing it with ElementTree, where Fredrik
    Martin> *does* have veto powers. I was pointing out that the case at
    Martin> hand is different.

I didn't know that, nor did I infer that Fredrik had veto power.  I wrote:

    I think we would give reasonably large weight to Fredrik Lundh's opinion
    on the change.

Skip
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4