RetroSearch Browse

Sun Mar 13 02:16:27 CET 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109192.html

On 3/12/2011 5:09 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Nick Coghlan<ncoghlan at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Reid Kleckner<reid.kleckner at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> They should be able to use a slotted cmp_to_key style class:
>>> http://docs.python.org/howto/sorting.html
>>>
>>> That will allocate 1 Python object with no dict per key, but that
>>> might not be good enough.
>>
>> Tuples are already slotted, so that isn't likely to help in this case.
>
> It's three allocations vs. one.  The first is tuple + str + int, while
> the adapter is just one object.  I'm not sure how it eventually shakes
> out, though.
>
> That said, it's still worse than Python 2, which is zero allocations.  :)

And revising the data so that no key and no cmp function is needed is 
zero allocations and faster. See my other post.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109192.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python3 regret about deleting list.sort(cmp=...)