On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:29 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: > Isn't that command correct only if you are merging into default? > ISTM that it should be "hg revert -ar <targetbranch>". In general, yes. However, the existing text refers specifically to the case of merging 3.2 into default, so I was trying to be consistent with that. The current text, after my proposed change, will be: hg update default hg merge 3.2 hg revert -ar default hg commit For full generality, you might want to say: hg update <targetbranch> hg merge <sourcebranch> hg revert -ar <targetbranch> hg commit However, the entire section on forward-porting is framed in terms of concrete examples (and that specific subsection refers explicitly to the "3.2 -> default" case). The existing text makes sense to me, so I don't see any need to change this. Regards, Nadeem
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4