On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Mark Dickinson <dickinsm at gmail.com> wrote: > I can also see the case for ripping out the peepholer entirely. But > reverting Antoine's patch seems like a step backwards. +1 to what Mark says here. If the day comes when the peepholer can be ripped out in favour of AST based optimisation, then yay. In the meantime, having it work as consistently as possible in picking up and optimising literal expressions makes for potentially valuable micro-optimisations that people don't have to worry about doing by hand. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4