Am 10.03.11 07:55, schrieb Neil Hodgson: > Martin v. Löwis: > >> I guess all this advice doesn't really apply to this case, though. >> The Microsoft API declares the parameter as a volatile*, indicating >> that they consider it "proper" usage of the API to declare the storage >> volatile. > > The 'volatile' here is a modifier on the parameter and does not > require a corresponding agreement in the variable declaration. I see. So then we don't need to make any changes. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4