> I’m of the opinion that hg diffs should always use the extended git > format, given their usefulness. A tool working with hg diffs that does > not support this format is broken IMO. IMO, it's "hg diff --git" that's broken, as it doesn't include the base revision (other formats, such as "hg export", do). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4