RetroSearch Browse

Tue Mar 8 01:00:11 CET 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108946.html

On 07/03/2011 23:52, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Michael Foord wrote:
>
>>     - I doubt calling it python.exe will fly, but I'm not sure. If so 
>> what will you call what is currently 'python.exe'? - if not then 
>> "python foo.py" on the command line will *still* not work...
>
> However, if it's installed as the exe associated with the .py
> and .pyw extensions, then simply 'foo.py' on the command line
> *will* work, and will work better than it does now.
>
So long as '.py' and '.pyw' are set in the PATHEXT environment variable. 
(Which again the Python installer doesn't do by default.)

Michael

-- 
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/

May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108946.html below:

[Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream