On Mar 07, 2011, at 07:44 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >I agree with Thomas' answer here: while a branch makes it easier to >maintain a patch (but you can also use e.g. Mercurial Queues), it >doesn't make it easier to *review*. You are assuming that I, as a >reviewer, want to know about the history of changesets that led to the >patch, but I don't: I want to read the patch as a cohesive whole, and I >couldn't care less about the various typo fixes, style changes, >performance tweaks that were checked in all along. I hear this complaint a lot from hg and git users, so maybe it's just the nature of the tools. In which case, I'm fine with whatever works better for Python. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110307/6bdb8fb1/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4