RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 7 18:31:12 CET 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108906.html

On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 12:04:18 -0500
Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> On Mar 07, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> 
> >If we can get to a mode where non-committers can push to a "fork" on
> >hg.python.org, we can dodge the patch format issue by having folks post
> >"pull requests" for that fork instaed.
> >
> >For the repoze and pylons projects, we have found the quality and
> >quantity of patches went up *significantly* when we made it easy for
> >somebody who doesn't work on the code all the time to use this workflow
> >(fork to a public repo, clone, hack, commit, push, request a pull).
> 
> +1.  'Branches' are better than patches.

How do you review a branch?

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108906.html below:

[Python-Dev] hg diff