On Mar 07, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Tres Seaver wrote: >If we can get to a mode where non-committers can push to a "fork" on >hg.python.org, we can dodge the patch format issue by having folks post >"pull requests" for that fork instaed. > >For the repoze and pylons projects, we have found the quality and >quantity of patches went up *significantly* when we made it easy for >somebody who doesn't work on the code all the time to use this workflow >(fork to a public repo, clone, hack, commit, push, request a pull). +1. 'Branches' are better than patches. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110307/dd9794d8/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4