RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 7 15:59:39 CET 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108895.html

On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 15:54 +0100, Éric Araujo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > Roadmap is not a strict plan for release. It helps people
> > *self-organize into teams* around specific feature or bugs.
> I think the tracker is used to this effect with success.
> 
> > Yes, there can (or even should) be a way for everybody with Python
> > account to vote on items in the Roadmap
> Doing something is a good way to vote.  For example, on #2504, a number
> of people added “+1” comments, but when I tried to move the patch
> forward and asked for tests and reviews, nobody replied.  Votes without
> commitment take time away from developers and don’t help with the work.
> 
> On the other hand, it is useful to get the feel of the community to know
> what bugs or features are really desired by our users.  If someone tried
> to create and maintain a roadmap, I’d be interested in the results.
> 
> Regards
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/anikom15%40gmail.com

+1 for voting

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108895.html below:

[Python-Dev] Official Roadmap (Re: Let's get PEP 380 into Python 3.3)