A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108853.html below:

[Python-Dev] r88758 - tracker/instances/python-dev/scripts/addpatchsets

[Python-Dev] r88758 - tracker/instances/python-dev/scripts/addpatchsets [Python-Dev] r88758 - tracker/instances/python-dev/scripts/addpatchsetsTerry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Mon Mar 7 00:23:49 CET 2011
On 3/6/2011 11:43 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:

> compute the base rev. Most reviewable patches should apply cleanly
> against the latest revision on "default",

That was sensible when we ported patches back, but if they should be 
ported forward (3.1 => 3.2 => default), do we not want the patch to 
apply to the earlier branch?

 > otherwise we're gonna ask the poster to regenerate the patch anyway.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4