On 05/03/2011 22:18, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Am 05.03.2011 19:26, schrieb Michael Foord: >> On 28/02/2011 21:59, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >>>>>> That's one of the big advantages that Jenkins (nee Hudson) has over >>>>>> buildbot - drilling down into individual test failures through the >>>>>> web ui. Your test run needs to generate appropriate xml for that to >>>>>> work though. >>>>> Buildbot can do this too. It can even do it without xml, although it >>>>> does need *some* parseable format, which I think the Python test suite >>>>> is a long way from. >>>>> >>>> That would be a great improvement to the Python buildbot infrastructure. >>> So would you be willing to contribute the necessary changes? >> To whom was this addressed? If to me I have the desire but lack the >> skill. > I honestly believe that you do have the skill, but perhaps lack the > knowledge (and yes, I meant to suggest that you work on this). Yes, that's what I meant. > I'd be also willing to help you getting started, especially assuming > you would want to sprint on that during PyCon. > Sprints will be an ideal opportunity. All the best, Michael > Regards, > Martin -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4