On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 00:52:08 +1000 > Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I'm actually OK with the status quo, but if we were going to change >> it, I would continue to leave (default) out. >> >> Completely unqualified = cpython default >> Only branch name = cpython branch >> Only repository name = other repository default >> repository name and branch name = other repository branch > > Well, I'm not sure, but the regularity of the "cpython" prefixes makes > it easier to distinguish cpython commits from non-cpython ones IMO. It's a mental pattern matching thing - word layout is noticed before word content. So the suggested scheme: [python-checkins] Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet [python-checkins] (3.1): Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet [python-checkins] devguide: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet [python-checkins] devguide (hg_migration): Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet provides more distinctive subject lines than the current: [python-checkins] cpython: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet [python-checkins] cpython (3.1): Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet [python-checkins] devguide: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet [python-checkins] devguide (hg_migration): Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet What we have isn't bad, but I agree with Benjamin that it could be better. Cheers, Nick -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4