A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108679.html below:

[Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream

[Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstreamGuido van Rossum guido at python.org
Fri Mar 4 20:14:35 CET 2011
Is there any discussion still going on about the details of the PEP
(now PEP 394)? I'm in favor of the general idea. What about Windows? I
think it should be the same there if possible.

The only thing I note is that the PEP doesn't explicitly state (unless
I missed it) that "python" should invoke the same Python binary as
either "python2" or "python3" and not some other version of Python
{2,3}.x (at least not until python4 is being considered :-).
Similarly, python2 and python3 should refer to one of the existing
python2.x or python3.x binary and not some other one.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4