RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 2 14:46:17 CET 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108538.html

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
>> A remark: Having all clones created under a dedicated namespace (say
>> sandbox) could make the hg.python.org listing clearer, since all user
>> clones would be grouped.
>
> Sure, we can change the enforced convention depending on the majority's
> preference. I chose that one because other devs thought it would be bad
> to let people create many repos at the top-level.

Having user clones flagged by the two-level names should be more than
enough when it comes to what the server enforces. That way we can be
flexible about additional namespaces (although using "sandbox" by
convention should cover most use cases).

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108538.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] devguide (hg_transition): Update instructions to use the new "server-side clone" button