On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:49:42 -0600 skip at pobox.com wrote: > > Antoine> We already have "make test" and "make buildbottest" in addition > Antoine> to "./python -m test". I think another subtly different way of > Antoine> running the tests would be a nuisance. > > I see nothing wrong with "make rigoroustest" or "make brutaltest". I > routinely use "make test" but never remember the necessary incantations for > enabling everything that regrtest can do (random test order, leak tests, > skip nothing, etc). Well, "make buildbottest" should do the trick. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4