On 28 June 2011 16:06, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso <sdaoden at googlemail.com> wrote: > @ Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote (2011-06-28 16:46+0200): >> UTF-8 without BOM displays incorrectly in vim(1) > > Stop right now (you're oh so wrong)! :-) Sorry. Please add "using the default settings of gvim on Windows". My context throughout was Windows not Unix. Sorry I didn't make that clear. > (By the way: UTF-8 and BOM? Windows uses it, I believe. My tests specifically used files with no BOM, just utf8-encoded text. I made this statement to head off people assuming that UTF8 can be detected in Windows by looking at the first few bytes. > Interesting things i learn on this list. :-) > And i hope in ten years we can laugh about this -> UTF-8 > transition all over the place, 'cause it's simply working.) That would be good... Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4