RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jun 26 15:55:02 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-June/112018.html

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:38 PM, ezio.melotti
<python-checkins at python.org> wrote:
> -.. [#] The exception is propagated to the invocation stack only if there is no
> -   :keyword:`finally` clause that negates the exception.
> +.. [#] The exception is propagated to the invocation stack unless
> +   there is a :keyword:`finally` clause which happens to raise another
> +   exception. That new exception causes the old one to be lost.

I believe the footnote was talking about this case:

>>> def f():
...   try:
...     raise Exception()
...   finally:
...     return "What exception?"
...
>>> f()
'What exception?'

The new wording doesn't accurately reflect that.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-June/112018.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (3.2): #11669: rephrase footnote in the Compound Statements page.