RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jun 14 02:00:45 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-June/111932.html

On 14/06/2011 00:46, Carl Meyer wrote:
> [snip...]
> So I don't think a virtualenv stdlib module would be at all likely to
> break on a new OS release, if Python itself is not broken by that OS
> release. (It certainly wouldn't be the stdlib module most likely to be
> broken by OS changes, in comparison to e.g. shutil, threading...)
>

And if we gain Carl as a Python committer to help maintain it, then I'd 
say it is worth doing for that reason alone...

Michael

> Carl
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk

-- 
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/

May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-June/111932.html below:

[Python-Dev] In-Python virtualisation and packaging