On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: > I should have made more clear in the message that this is actually a > regression from 2.6. Actually looking at the inspect docs, I'm not sure where such a note would fit anyway. I'll think about it a bit more - I have a suspicion there may be a flawed assumption in that inspect code and it should be passing more queries through to linecache rather than trying to second-guess it regarding what source code is available. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4