On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:35 AM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat.com> wrote: > After ~12 years of doing this, it comes naturally. I appreciate that > this may come across as weird though :) I actually thought Brett's rationale in the checkin comment was reasonable (if you get in the habit of putting constants on the left, then the classic "'=' instead of '=='" typo is a compiler error instead of a reassignment). Call it a +0 in favour of letting people put constants on the left in C code if they prefer it that way, so long as any given if/elif chain is consistent in the style it uses. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4