On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:40 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >> I followed up on the tracker. I'm +0 on adding this to 2.6, but not until >> after the 2.6.7 release on Friday. >> >> How well has this change been tested? Are there people for whom this could >> break things? > > As others have pointed out: it would break systems that don't have the > _ssl module built. yeah, we would need to fallback to http in that case. while using https by default is a nice addition, maybe we should also look at adding a scp-like upload/register command, since the server has now this ability. > > Regards, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ziade.tarek%40gmail.com > -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4