On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:27 AM, eric.araujo wrote: > > Fix reST label for collections ABCs. > > The previous markup hijacked the abstract-base-classes glossary entry, > which resulted in the HTML linking to collections.abc when defining the > generic ABC concept. Now the glossary links to the abc module. I think the users are better served by links to collections.abc, io.abc, etc. For the most part, glossary readers will be interested in actual abstract classes than in the underlying implementation. IOW, I believe this edit makes the docs worse rather than better. Raymond -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110603/43b3b816/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4