On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > Wasn't this change only in 3.3 where __nonzero__ doesn't exist? So when PyPy > eventually supports Python 3 they will have to update to support __bool__ on > None but this test won't exercise that for them. IOW I think the guard is > wrong and should go. The entire assertion was removed by Raymond's checkin, as the addition of None.__bool__ made it false on CPython as well. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4