A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112698.html below:

[Python-Dev] Convention on functions that shadow existing stdlib functions

[Python-Dev] Convention on functions that shadow existing stdlib functionsNick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Jul 30 18:00:45 CEST 2011
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2011, at 01:23 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>>It sounds to me like you're really objecting to the devguide living in
>>a separate clone. This doesn't bode well for the prospects of ever
>>splitting the stdlib out from the CPython interpreter core...
>
> Actually, no.  I'm objecting to moving documentation for code to a different
> repo than the code.  If/when the stdlib is split out (which I support), then
> the documentation should go with it.

That's a rather valid point that I can definitely agree with.

OK, you've convinced me that the right thing to do is leave the
test.support docs where they are and just apply the appropriate markup
to keep them out of the various indices.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4