RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jul 30 17:30:41 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112696.html

On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
> 2011/7/29 Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net>:
>> Shouldn't there be a matching Doc change somewhere?
>
> Somewhere is the question!

While None/NotImplemented/Ellipsis are all documented as singletons,
the behaviour of calling their types is not specified anywhere. If
this was to be detailed anywhere, then the sections on
None/NotImplemented/Ellipsis in section 3.2 of the language reference
would be the place.

And on that note... was there any particular reason for leaving
NotImplemented out for this change?

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112696.html below:

make the types of None and Ellipsis callable