RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jul 30 04:26:28 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112672.html

On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:32:57 +0200, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:51:18 -0400
> Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> > On Jul 29, 2011, at 05:25 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > 
> > >> test.support *is* part of the stdlib.
> > >
> > >We have lots of internal APIs which are not documented, though.
> > >And test.support *is* for internal use.
> > 
> > The solution then is to rename test.support to test._support to make it clear
> > it's an internal implementation detail.  Then you can remove the entire
> > section from the stdlib docs and just document it in the code.
> 
> Ideally so. Practically, it's a lot of churn and additional pain
> merging 3.2 bugfixes into default. The lack of an underscore doesn't
> always mean the API is public, because it hasn't always worked like
> this (we have many private APIs without an underscore).

I'm not sure it makes merging more difficult.  I haven't had any
problems with email test merges even though I moved (i.e. renamed)
the test directory.

--
R. David Murray           http://www.bitdance.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112672.html below:

[Python-Dev] Convention on functions that shadow existing stdlib functions