On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:36:03 +0200, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:19:45 -0400 > "R. David Murray" <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote: > > > > > Besides, "hg status" is meant to show untracked files which could > > > *potentially* be tracked. It's not like anybody wants to track .orig > > > and .rej files, so having them in the ignore list is still the right > > > thing to do. > > > > That's one view. My view is that 'hg status' tells me all the files > > that have appeared in my tree that I'm either not currently tracking or > > explicitly ignoring (because the project's automated tools will deal > > with them). Nothing in there about limiting it to files I *might* > > want to track. That is how I've always used my version control > > systems. > > Ok, I understand. However, it also makes things more tedious for other > people who don't user their VCS in such a way, so it would be nice how > other people feel about this. They can add those files to their personal .hgrc. I can't *remove* those ignores via mine. -- R. David Murray http://www.bitdance.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4