On 7/29/2011 11:18 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I'd much rather solve this problem by adding markup to functions that > explicitly disclaim our normal backward compatibility guarantees. I suggested adding a footnote marker (1) to each one. > test.support *is* part of the stdlib. > So once again, is this a real actual problem you've witnessed in enough cases > to go through all the trouble of moving the documentation, and making it more > difficult to find? I agree with this. When working on tests, I would prefer to have test.support doc in the same offine doc set as unittest docs. I only supported *moving* as an alternative to *deleting*. Terry J. Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4