RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jul 24 01:27:55 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112490.html

On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:13:07 +1000
Ryan Kelly <ryan at rfk.id.au> wrote:
> 
> In latest trunk this optimisation seems to have gone away, the code is
> now:
> 
>         TARGET(BINARY_SUBSCR)
>             w = POP();
>             v = TOP();
>             x = PyObject_GetItem(v, w);
>             Py_DECREF(v);
>             Py_DECREF(w);
>             SET_TOP(x);
>             if (x != NULL) DISPATCH();
>             break;
> 
> The implementation of PyObject_GetItem doesn't appear to have changed
> though.  Maybe this optimisation was no longer worth it in practice? 

The optimization was probably removed because PyInt objects don't exist
anymore. There's a related but more ambitious patch at
http://bugs.python.org/issue10044.

In practice however, such micro-optimizations usually have little or no
effect.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112490.html below:

[Python-Dev] tuple[int] optimization