On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:55:28 +1000 Mark Hammond <skippy.hammond at gmail.com> wrote: > > > The two proposals > > overlap but are not mutually exclusive. For future pythons, 'python33' > > is easier to remember and type than 'py -v 3.3' or whatever the proposed > > encantation is. > > 'py -3.3' - less chars to type than 'python33' and with no need to have > every Python directory on your PATH. IMO it is also simple enough that > people will remember it fairly easily. Given that Python 2.x has a "-3" option, isn't "py -3.3" kind of confusing, at least to the eye? Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4