On 7/20/2011 12:25 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Le 20/07/2011 17:58, Éric Araujo a écrit : >> Do we have a policy of not adding new test files to stable branches? > New logging tests failed during some weeks. If we add new tests, we may > also break some stable buildbots. I don't think that we need to add > these new tests to a stable version. When bugs are fixed in stable branches, they are usually accompanied by tests that fail without the bugfix. I have understood the policy to be that new tests go into stable branches. Failure indicates a bug in either the not-really-so-stable branch or the test. In the latter case, remove the test everywhere until fixed. In the former case, either fix the bug in the stable branch immediately or open an issue and attach the test code (skipping the test needed stage) or just disable it and note on the issue that a fix patch should re-enable. The logging tests may have been exceptional some way. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4