A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112366.html below:

"Simplified Package Layout and Partitioning"

[Python-Dev] Draft PEP: "Simplified Package Layout and Partitioning" [Python-Dev] Draft PEP: "Simplified Package Layout and Partitioning"Neal Becker ndbecker2 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 20 16:40:18 CEST 2011
I wonder if this fixes the long-standing issue in OS vendor's distributions.  In 
Fedora, for example, there is both arch-specific and non-arch directories: 
/usr/lib/python2.7 + /usr/lib64/python2.7, for example.  Pure python goes into 
/usr/lib/python2.7, and code including binaries goes into /usr/lib64/python2.7.  
But if a package has both, it all has to go into /usr/lib64/python2.7, because 
the current loader can't find pieces in 2 different directories.

You can't have both /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/foo and 
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/foo.

So if this PEP will allow pieces of foo to be found in 2 different places, that 
would be helpful, IMO.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4