RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jul 20 15:29:21 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112362.html

On 07/20/2011 08:57 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 06:46 PM 7/20/2011 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:58 PM, P.J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
>> > So, without further ado, here it is:
>>
>> I pushed this version up to the PEPs repo, so it now has a number
>> (402) and can be read in prettier HTML format:
>> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0402/
> 
> Technically, shouldn't this be a 3XXX series PEP?  Or are we not doing
> those any more now that all PEPs would be 3XXX?

I think we're back to normal PEP numbering. PEP 382 was also 3.x only.

Eric.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112362.html below:

"Simplified Package Layout and Partitioning"