At 06:46 PM 7/20/2011 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: >On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:58 PM, P.J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote: > > So, without further ado, here it is: > >I pushed this version up to the PEPs repo, so it now has a number >(402) and can be read in prettier HTML format: >http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0402/ Technically, shouldn't this be a 3XXX series PEP? Or are we not doing those any more now that all PEPs would be 3XXX?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4