On 7/7/2011 7:28 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > The main point of the PEP, IMO, is actually the deprecation itself. By > deprecating, we signal that something isn't actively maintained > anymore, and that a (allegedly better) alternative is available. > I think that's a very reasonable thing to do, regardless of whether or > not the "thing" actually gets removed in a later version. Yes, the final decision could be deprecate now, remove in 4.0, as happened during the 2.x series.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4