On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 22:08:45 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Currently, nobody has stepped forward to do the work of maintaining > the codecs IO implementation independently of the io module, so the > only two options seriously on the table are B and C. Since nobody has stepped up to implement option B either, I think the only option seriously on the table is C. > Now, it may be that this PEP runs afoul of Guido's stated preference > not to introduce any more backwards incompatibilities between 2.x and > 3.x that aren't absolutely essential. Well, a deprecation isn't an incompatibility in itself. Especially when deprecation warnings are hidden by default. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4