On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:27:00 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote: > > One could also use the somewhat euphemistic "unprofessional language". > That points to why such changes are justified despite an author's > right to have her mode of expression respected -- the Python project > aims at professionalism, and offensive language detracts from it. I sincerely hope we don't start using the word "professional" to denote "careful" or "good quality". Most professional work is crap, and that's why we have open source. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4